sergejzr (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Exactly. Todays cars just burn unburned reusable fuel in the CAT and heat the environment instead of using the heat for producing fuel. Such waste of petrol makes the oil bosses happy. The idea to reuse heat and exhaust gases for fuel synthesis is just brilliant. Why it is not in todays cars? This should be the main question here. But I think most of us know the answer...

sergejzr (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Thanks!

consaka1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

AND todays cars need some of those extra unburnt hydrocarbons to fuel the CAT.

MattBlytheTheOne (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

/watch?v=aGg0ATfoBgo

consaka1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Definition of water is H2O. It does NOT burn. If you turn it into a gas first it will burn but then its not water is it? lol

consaka1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

yep thats the best way to clear up bad carbon deposits.. pop a little water in while it is running.. done it many times myself..

sumixSTYXX (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

...this was a reaction to sergejzr... Well, if somebody knows whether it's possible to run a two-stroke engine using this fuel system, I'd be glad to read more about it :)

sumixSTYXX (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

It's a four-stroke engine (the two-stroke engines have a characteristical noise). I think running two-stroke engine using this system isn't possible unless it has a dedicated system for dosing oil... but, even with that, it would be a problem because when there's a dedicated system for oil dosing, it's mixed with the fuel before entering the carburator AFAIK - and here's no carburator. But maybe adding the oil in the fuel mixture might do the job - the oil vapors might lubricate the engine.

sergejzr (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Hi, nice video. a question, is it a two-stroke, or four-stroke cycle engine? Will geet not produce problems on two-stroke cycle engine since it needs oil in the fuel?

113MPG (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

That motor was cranking.