|
grenda5 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
very well done,espescially for a layman like me,it was well explained and fascinating,thanks for posying this.
anandaadhar (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
It is the theory to be tested, yes a graviton theory. It is one of the many. The original Maxwell provides twenty equations with twenty unknowns; complicated indeed. Heavyside simplified it, but the original version describes the interaction with forces acting from the putside, from space in our case.
Eviscera09 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
the operation of this device relies on a flow of gravitons? I'm not sure I understand...gravitons at this point in time are theoretical(not to say they don't exist, and there fore can't effect based on that assumption), and are also theorized to act in proportion to the agreed upon coefficient of gravity it's self, as being that of the weakest of the four forces. the explination of the operation of this device assumes too many unknowns to be plausible. unless I'm misunderstanding something big.
anandaadhar (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You mean my website, theorderoftime? There are some java-programs, but with virusses it has nothing to do...
rickharriss (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
WARNING the web site generates a virus infection alarm. Access with caution.
anandaadhar (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The ideais that stressing the fields leads to replenishing from the vacuum., extra on top of what the magnets do in restoring.Thus it would be free or extra energy.
brettnnn (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
it isn't free energy because you use the magnetic field of the magnets but it lasts about 400 years for a permanent magnet so if you align the magnets right the magnetic field will push the motor.
anandaadhar (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
yes, Hamel even wanted to build a flying saucer of his egyptian Jed-set-up. But that was too anbitious as far as i.a.c. Enough woud be to have a selfrunner with the hamel effect. That is enough proof of magnetic OU. The rest is then to engineers. But alas the psychology leads us away from the proof and into the ego of our ignorance.. If people copy Hamel it is a fact. Also if I succeed here, it is still a fact only when others can replicate it. Then we have the break-through we are looking for.
anandaadhar (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The latter is our axiom here.
anandaadhar (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
BeradensMEG= Bearden's MEG |
