|
anandaadhar (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I found about the same studying my Hamel GMD replication. see ?v=MP4Y6nzaPRg
athan9an (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
well i don't know.Maybe he spin's it at the start by hand cos he doesn't show us how it's starting, right? I really don't understand why he's not posting his conclusions.
LaSaro888 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
yes, but hwy revolutions fading in the end of this "Clanzers hamel spiner`s" video?
athan9an (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i think u got it a bit wrong.the ball must move on its axis also.thats why u re using a ball and not a shaft.see how the hamel engine moves (the cones).its the same principle.Watch "Clanzers hamel spinner re-post of part 4" video on utube, its a great start.
airste172 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
This is the first video pertaining to this subject (magnetic propulsion) that makes any sense to me. The intelligence and integrity displayed here is very much appreciated!
TheBlackSky000 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Thanks LaSaro888 and both of those who explain it clearly in this video clip.
Most people think they can get an energy from nothing and this is not true!
LaSaro888 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
yes, it`s wrong way to get something out of it. but we only were trying this composition, becose, we saw it on internet, where som one was presenting it like a real thing.
fhtmca (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
your doing it very wrong, the same outter circle should be taken place in the center, just in a smaller version...the cirlce once again with negative faceing positive but u can never do it with 1 solid magnet in the middle, u also dont have the angle formula in any of ur magnets, neg,pos,neg,pos,neg,pos |
